| On February 22, 2012 I went to the Bank to pay a $1,188 installment on a personal line of credit. I placed the money on the counter, the teller counted it, she gave me back my change and she used my bank card to record the straightforward and routine transaction. As the following document clearly illustrates, $1,188.00 was deposited into my account and $1,188 was withdrawn to pay the bill as it was duly stamped to note the obvious.  Reasonable people would not require any more evidence to prove that the payment which was due on March 6, 2012 was in fact made but according to the bank, it did not receive any cash from me on February 22nd 2012 and they used an extremely obscure security video to "prove" this transparent falsehood. When I complained about the unpaid bill in question, the bank called the police on me. The police failed to make my concerns go away and the very next morning (after weeks of stalling) I was called in to the bank and I was finally granted the opportunity to view the surveillance video. The date was April 26, 2012 and I was startled to witness what appeared to be a digital, fast-forward, PVR (Personal video recorder) presentation that looked like the work of an amateur animator. The gap between one digital frame and the next appeared to be different, suggesting that frames had been removed to hide something and that made it rather difficult to believe I was viewing an authentic portrayal of the events in question. Despite the obscurity, the video exposed the fact that my hands entered and exited my pockets with a frequency which confirms my version of events, and I was more than staisfied that the noted transaction with the paid stamp is a depiction whichaccurately confirms the cash deposit which is inappropriately denied. Moreover, the conclusive insistence that the teller did not handle my money on February 22nd, 2012 is not believable because the surveillance video that was shown to me was taken from the vantage point where the teller had her back to the camera. If you are the sort who is easily dazzled by cheap tricks or magic, you can certainly suggest that the teller did not receive any money from me, but under the circumstances, that is clearly not a credible proposition. I reviewed surveillance videos on youtube which relate to robberies and they were crystal clear in comparison to the smoke and mirrors routine I was granted the opportunity to review. It is extremely disturbing to be the victim of a crime and to be threatened by the police (listen to the audio) and if we ever manage to excavate all the heads that are buried in the sand, we will one day realize that this happens far more often than most are aware and some of the people who are abused in the manner I was are incarcerated without just cause. MOREOVER, if we allow the bank to use a silly accounting gimmick to steal $1,188, they can use the very same process to steal five billion dollars, and that is the ultimate point.
This is a simple case where the truth cannot be covered up because banking records are evidently proving to be more reliable than surveillance videos. Clearly, there is no question about the fact that the bank should have applied the cash deposit received to pay the bill in question. Indeed, before the bill was paid, the balance in my account was $5,434.96, and if the teller had not received $1,188.00 in cash, there would be no deposit on record, just a single withdrawl from the $5,434.96 in the bank account.
Under the circumstances, it is simply ludicrous to suggest that I did not make a $1,188 cash deposit on February 22nd, 2012 and if the smoke and mirrors, surveillance video suggests otherwise the above record of an actual bank deposit speaks for itself.
Bank records clearly indicate that after I made my $1,188 deposit, my balance was $6,622.96 and after the money was applied to the bill the teller stamped, it was $5,434.96. If I am being redundant, it is simply to confirm the obvious --"Bank Robs Man", and it isn't funny.
NEXT: This alteration of evidence is not unusual it happens all the time. |
